Health Equity Policy Quad Caucus Session
Talk/Presentation · March 2024
The National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators (NHCSL) invited the Satcher Health Leadership Institute to present at the Quad Caucus Health Equity Policy Session during the 2024 Spring Executive Committee and BBA Meeting in Atlanta — a follow-up to Prof. Daniel Dawes' 2021 briefing to the Quad Caucus on COVID-era data gaps affecting communities of color. The session brought Hispanic, Black, Native American, and Asian American/Pacific Islander state legislators together with SHLI leadership to explore how the (by then significantly expanded) Health Equity Tracker could inform state-level health equity legislation.
Related work
Building a Zero-Cost Grant Monitoring Microservice
With our three team roles confirmed funded through FY27, I began transitioning into a grants-facing capacity alongside my UX engineering responsibilities, taking on the early infrastructure work that a dedicated grants professional would otherwise own.
Rather than monitoring dozens of foundation websites manually or investing in a grant database subscription that tracked historical awards rather than live open calls, I scoped and built Grant Watchdog: a lightweight automation tool that watches the live web pages of curated funder targets for changes, flags potential new opportunities, and generates a plain-language report the whole team can read.
Social Responsibilities Round Table Talk
From Data to Action: How Open-Source Health Data Platforms Democratize Research and Empower Community Advocacy
Open-source platforms like HET democratize research, transforming health equity from an academic concept to a community tool
Claim What Is Yours: A Trauma-Informed Content System for a High-Stakes Writing Task
Claim What Is Yours was a personal initiative I built to address a gap I'd lived through directly: veterans navigating VA disability claims — particularly for conditions tied to military sexual trauma — face a writing task that is procedurally demanding and, for many, close to impossible to approach directly. I designed a four-part content system (a free introductory guide plus a core guide with two companion modules) to walk survivors from "I don't know where to start" to a completed claim package, using AI tools as a structured writing partner along the way.
Description The core design problem wasn't information delivery — the VA's process is documented; it's the access gap between knowing the steps and being able to sit down and do them. I addressed that in a few specific ways: Staged disclosure architecture. Rather than asking a reader to write their most difficult account first, I sequenced the material so the hardest writing task (the formal MST stressor statement) comes after three lower-stakes "shadow work" exercises — third-person narration, a before/after contrast, and a behavioral-markers inventory — each one building material the reader can carry forward into the harder document, so no one starts at the hardest point. Structured AI-prompting as a writing scaffold. I wrote reusable, fill-in-the-blank prompt templates for every major document in the process (personal statements, nexus letter requests, buddy letter asks), each engineered to produce output in the reader's own voice rather than a generic or clinical one, and each paired with explicit guidance on what to check in the output before using it. Explicit safety and data-literacy guidance. Because the audience would be using AI tools for the first time, often around highly sensitive material, I included direct instruction on what not to disclose to an AI platform, how to evaluate a tool's data practices, and clear crisis-line signposting throughout — treating tool literacy as part of the content's job, not an afterthought. A tiered information structure. Free → core guide → bonus modules, so a reader in crisis could access something immediately useful at zero cost, with a deeper system available for those ready to go further.
Let's connect